External Hard Drive - Better USB 3 or Thunderbolt?

USB 3 or Thunderbolt
USB 3 or Thunderbolt
USB 3 or Thunderbolt - that is the question (Photo: Sir Apfelot).

External hard drives are often bought to store files, to back up the iPhone or iMovie library or to be used as a TimeMachine volume. With current Macs, the question arises whether you should buy a USB-3 or a Thunderbolt hard drive. In this article, I would like to briefly explain the advantages and disadvantages of the individual interfaces in relation to use with hard drives on the Mac.

Advantages of USB 3 hard drives

In my opinion, the most powerful argument in favor of an external hard drive with [USB-3 connection-> usb-3] is simply the price. As a user you naturally want to get as much storage space as possible for as little money as possible and in this respect you are well served with an external USB 3 hard drive. The small 2,5 inch hard drives with 1 TB capacity are available for less than 70 EUR and the USB cable is already included. If you want to get something comparable to a Thunderbold hard drive, you have to spend about three times as much (including the [Thunderbolt cable-> thunderbolt cable]).

Also advantageous for USB 3 is the fact that the cable for USB 3 can be up to 5 meters long, while with [Thunderbolt->thunderbolt] you should “only” connect cables that are 2 meters long. The data throughput for USB 3 is specified as 4,8 GBit/s, which in practice results in speeds of 50-100 MB/s depending on the type of files that are read and the hard disk model. If you're not in a hurry, you'll definitely get by with a USB-3 hard drive. Especially as a backup medium, these disks are the best choice when you consider the price-performance ratio.

Advantages of the Thunderbolt hard drives

Hard disks with a Thunderbolt connection clearly score points in terms of speed. This is understandable because the Thunderbolt 1 interface can transmit up to 10 GBits / s in full duplex mode. This is twice the USB-3 speed. In practice, however, things look different, because the limiting factor with an external hard drive is no longer the interface, but the built-in hard drive, which simply slows down the data transfer due to the access times of the mechanical read heads. If you really want to use the full power of Thunderbolt with an external hard drive, you must inevitably switch to an external SSD with Thunderbolt, because this can then also use the bandwidth of Thunderbolt in practice.

Conclusion: USB 3 is currently ahead

If you don't have a special case and are dependent on the Thunderbolt connection, I currently don't see any practical advantage that you would have with a [Thunderbolt hard disk-thunderbolt hard disk] over a USB-3 hard disk. If the [SSD hard disks-> ssd hard disk] can compete with the rotating hard disks in terms of capacity and price, things will look different again, because then they are about twice as fast in data transfer - a point that would certainly justify a small surcharge for some users. But until then it will certainly be a few more months.

-
Did you like the article and did the instructions on the blog help you? Then I would be happy if you the blog via a Steady Membership or at Patreon would support.

4 Responses to "External Hard Drive - Better USB 3 or Thunderbolt?"

  1. Pingback: Is Thunderbolt faster than USB 3? “Sir Apfelot

  2. Your conclusion is correct only with great reservations. It does not apply to Raid-0 hard disk systems that continue to rely on rotating disks, but write / read them in parallel, which means that higher data rates can be achieved. Those who rely on high data rates from 200 MByte / s and low access times (keyword: audio / video production) cannot avoid SSD and here USB with approx. 350 MByte / s is a certain bottleneck. Thunderbolt is particularly useful on Macs. However, 500 euros are due for half a terabyte.

    1. Hello Sir Paulchen! (Nice name!) Of course you are right with the objection. I saw the matter more from the point of view of the user, who simply clamps it to the computer as an external disk without a raid. If you use a raid, of course, it looks different. But I can't report anything about it because I have no practical experience with such expensive equipment. :-)

  3. Pingback: Mac OS X Yosemite - first impressions and problems

Post a comment

Your e-mail address will not be published. Required fields are marked with * marked

In the Sir Apfelot Blog you will find advice, instructions and reviews on Apple products such as the iPhone, iPad, Apple Watch, AirPods, iMac, Mac Pro, Mac Mini and Mac Studio.