I often write test reports on vacuum cleaning robots, cordless vacuum cleaners or normal mains-powered vacuum cleaners. In this context, I usually also study the technical data of the vacuum cleaner and keep stumbling over the manufacturer's information on the suction power. While in the past the suction power was often equated with the value of the electrical power consumption and given in watts, current cordless vacuum cleaner models tend to have units with the abbreviation "Pa" or "AW".
In this article I would like to go into these values and explain how important (or unimportant) it is to look for a high number in these values when buying a vacuum cleaner. But let's start with the "old" specification Watt and the new unit "Air Watt"...
Chapter in this post:
- 1 Update 19.10.2022/XNUMX/XNUMX: Experience shows that high suction power should not be a purchase criterion
- 2 What is the difference between Watt and Air Watt?
- 3 What does the unit Pa say about the suction force?
- 4 Conversion of AW (Air Watts) into kPa (Kilo Pascal)
- 5 Pa values from practice
- 6 vacuum cleaners with particularly high suction power
- 7 robot vacuum cleaners with 4.000 Pa
- 8 cordless cordless vacuum cleaners 27.000 to 33.000 Pa
- 9 mains operated cylinder vacuum cleaners
- 10 cylinder vacuum cleaners with bags
- 11 cylinder vacuum cleaners with dust box
- 12 Similar posts
Update 19.10.2022/XNUMX/XNUMX: Experience shows that high suction power should not be a purchase criterion
Due to my blogger work, I often test new vacuum cleaners and always list the value for the suction power. However, what I've noticed over the last few years is that a high suction power number doesn't say anything about how good a vacuum cleaner actually says it is.
This applies to cordless hand vacuum cleaners as well as to vacuum cleaning robots. If I had to recommend two models here, I would pick the Dyson Absolute V11 name and as a vacuum cleaning robot the Ecovac's X1 Omni choose.
Both models leave a very clean living space and both also deal very well with pet hair.
What is the difference between Watt and Air Watt?
The question should rather be, what do Watt and Air Watt have in common, because it is not much. Watt is the unit for electrical power. For example, it shows how much electricity a vacuum cleaner needs. However, since this information has little informative value about the suction power of a vacuum cleaner, some manufacturers have started to specify the suction power in Air Watt (AW).
The number for Air Watt - sometimes called Luftwatt - is determined by the negative pressure that the vacuum cleaner can create and the amount of air it can move in a given time. That sounds like a sensible thing, but as with all other values that are currently being quoted by manufacturers, Air Watt does not have any direct information about how great the suction force is at the nozzle, because the suction power can be from the measuring point close to the motor quickly fall off to the nozzle through branches and unwanted openings in the air system.
To make matters worse, Air Watt is not an internationally defined, physical unit. The figures that manufacturers give for Air Watt should not be seen as values that can be directly compared - although they should actually be.
What does the unit Pa say about the suction force?
Pa is an abbreviation for the Pascal unit, which is used in physics to indicate a pressure difference. This makes sense because a vacuum cleaner creates a vacuum to suck in dirt and dust. And the higher the Pa value, the more negative pressure the vacuum cleaner generates and the better the suction power. In short: A lot of “Pa” is good!? No, unfortunately it's not that easy - but more on that below when it comes to the practical values.
The change in the specification of watts (W) to Pascal (Pa) was made sometime after the EU created a law that limits the power consumption of vacuum cleaners to 900 watts. Since one could no longer score with high watt values with consumers (more than 900 watts were no longer allowed), the unit Pa was used, with which one could again play with high numbers for marketing purposes.
The manufacturers were therefore forced to budget with the electrical energy and still generate a high suction power. The vacuum cleaners automatically became more efficient. As a result, specifying the watt value no longer made sense and the specification Pascal (Pa) was established to convey to customers how powerful a vacuum cleaner is.
Interesting article on the subject of “suction power”:
Conversion of AW (Air Watts) in kPa (Kilo Pascal)
Some vacuum cleaner manufacturers, such as Dyson, indicate the power of their vacuum cleaners in Air Watts (AW). Unfortunately, I could not find an exact conversion into kPA, but the following values were equated at the consumer advice center in South Tyrol:
- 250 - 400 air watts
- 1300 - 2200 mm / H2O
- 13-22 kPa = 13.000-22.000 Pa
That would mean that 1 AW equals 52 Pa. I therefore use these numbers as a rough basis for the conversion to convert Air Watt values into Pa values for my table below with practical values.
Pa values from practice
The manufacturer himself is responsible for measuring the Pa value. There are no rules as to where this value has to be taken with a measuring device. You have a high value directly on the engine, but this can decrease on the way to the nozzle if there are leaks in the air duct.
Accordingly, some “caution” is recommended by manufacturers when specifying the Pa values. Unknown manufacturers in particular may be measured very "optimistically" in order to achieve an advertising effect.
In order to get a feeling for how “good” a vacuum cleaner is, I have brought together a few values that I found on various manufacturer websites.
- Robot vacuum cleaners work in the range from 2000 to 4000 Pa
- Cordless vacuum cleaners have between 10.000 and 20.000 Pa
- Cylinder vacuum cleaners (mains operated) have between 13.000 and 25.000 Pa
Vacuum cleaner with particularly high suction power
For further "entertainment" I have selected a few best-of models here. So a couple of devices that have a particularly high suction power in their class.
Robot vacuum cleaner with 4.000 Pa
- Dreame L10 Pro vacuum and floor mopping robot
- Testor M1
- DashTech vacuum robot
- iRobot robotic vacuum cleaner
- Neabot Q11
Cordless battery vacuum cleaner 27.000 to 33.000 Pa
At this point a tip from me: The Dyson V11 Animal + is expensive and has "only" about 12.000 Pa, but I have a previous model and it has an incredibly good cleaning performance thanks to its motor brush.
Mains operated cylinder vacuum cleaners
In the case of cylinder vacuum cleaners, unfortunately, the watt value in the specification of the power is still used. Accordingly, I was unable to make a “best of” selection based on the Pa value.
A selection based on watts, however, does not make sense either, since non-name companies are specifically throwing models on the market that simply have 900 watts of power consumption, but may work very inefficiently. So suction power is by no means to be equated with watts.
I therefore use a test by Stiftung Warentest to make a selection, which also contained cylinder vacuum cleaners with bags or dust boxes. Here are the four best models:
Vacuum cleaner with bag
Cylinder vacuum cleaner with dust box
I hope that with my explanations about the values Watt, kPa, Pa and Air Watt, I was able to help you a little further in researching the right vacuum cleaner for you. Basically, as is so often the case with technical devices: the numbers alone do not say so much. You can use it as a guide, but ultimately the quality of the vacuum cleaner has to be right, because what use is a high Pa value if it was only measured under laboratory conditions and the vacuum cleaner does not pick up bread crumbs in everyday life.
I therefore stick to well-known companies such as Miele, eufy, Bosch, Dreame, Dyson and the like. You are seldom disappointed.
Related Articles
Nerd jewelry: molecules, DNA, lab supplies and more than necklace, earring, ring, etc.- 24 exciting puzzles: EXIT Advent calendar instead of chocolate
- Retro sound advent calendar – become a sound machine in 24 steps
- GEOlino Advent calendar with physics, chemistry and biology experiments
- Monkeytype – measure your own writing speed and error rate (have it measured)
- What does “Don’t feed the trolls” mean?
- DaVinci Resolve error solved: Render Job 1 failed as the current clip could not be processed
- Instructions: Reset Apple TV - here's how to do it
Jens has been running the blog since 2012. He acts as Sir Apfelot for his readers and helps them with technical problems. In his spare time he rides electric unicycles, takes photos (preferably with the iPhone, of course), climbs around in the Hessian mountains or hikes with the family. His articles deal with Apple products, news from the world of drones or solutions to current bugs.
Hallo,
I read that you tried to convert the pressure (pressure difference) into watts. Values are also given.
However, this can only be data from the data sheet.
From a physical point of view, one would still need the volume flow and the associated pressure difference. 20 kPa and the volume flow at this pressure difference.
The equation for the conversion would be
Power = volume flow times pressure
In units:
Power: watt or Nm / sec
Volume flow: cubic meters / sec
Pressure: Pa (Pascal), N / m2
So
Watt = m3 / sec * N / m2 = Nm / sec = Joule / sec = energy per time
1kPa = 10 mbar
It doesn't really help but maybe explains why you can't just convert
gruß
Hubert
Hello Hubert! Thanks for the interjection. It was almost clear to me that the units cannot be converted into each other so easily. But now I have the physical explanation for it. : D
Hallo,
I have a problem understanding the explanations here. Normal pressure, i.e. air pressure, is around 1 bar, which corresponds to around 1000 kPa... if a vacuum cleaner creates a vacuum of 6 kPa, that's a stronger vacuum than one that creates 13 kPa, isn't it 😅?
Hello Ilya! I'm not a great physicist either, but I think the negative pressure is the difference to "normal" pressure. In this case, a higher number is better, since a larger pressure difference also means more suction power. If I tell nonsense, I like to be corrected. 😂
Despite the name, vacuum cleaners don't actually create a vacuum. The only vacuum created by classic vacuum cleaners is when the tube is flush against a hard surface and the suction is sufficient to “seal” the gap. Personally, I would use the human force required to break the “seal” as a measure of suction power.
Viewed from this perspective, robot vacuum cleaners never create a vacuum. Your most important cleaning feature is the brush and how well it cleans gaps, e.g. B. in a carpet, so that the measly suction power can actually suck something up.
All right, that would make sense. After a long search I found another source that confirms this.
Thank you very much for your help.
This is the worst explanation of "vacuum" ever! Please convert these pa values into CFM/square centimeters...
A standard vacuum hose is
1 1/4″ As a test: Line up each manufacturer's machines and have them try to lift a baseball, then a billiard ball,
then a regular brick and then maybe a bowling ball.
The vacuum cleaner that lifts the most
is the strongest!
Thank you for your superlative assessment. People who classify something as the “worst explanation” for something always sound particularly serious to me. 😂 But anyway... to get to your point: What you suggest as "try" would be a try to have a physics experiment showing the strength. But that's exactly the point that I described above: The information itself says nothing about the actual suction power because there is no standardized method with which the vacuum cleaner manufacturers have to measure and specify the suction power. But your idea also has a problem: I know many vacuum cleaners that switch off completely when they notice that the pipe is blocked. And the second problem is: You would first have to buy all the vacuum cleaner models so that you have them on site to try. To put it in your own words: "This is the worst idea you can have to assess the suction power of vacuum cleaners before you buy them." But no offense… thanks for participating with a comment. 😊
Jay is right, convert everything to CFM. I've made a table of the models I'm interested in (I'm looking for data on the internet) and this is the reference point for the thrust. The power in watts is the current draw at a certain voltage and with all the fun of the motor, this power is "loaded" by the efficiency of the motor and the boosters of the system it drives, no one says that explicitly, it's more like marketing bullshit that they added some kind of turbine. What comes out is the thrust in CFM and that's the most important thing.
Thanks for the information. Your answer is exactly what I was hoping for, although I don't quite understand why the companies don't or don't want to give more useful numbers.
Yes, unfortunately I also don't understand why there are no practical comparison values, but the manufacturers are certainly happy that they can advertise with values that are technically difficult or impossible to understand. When choosing vacuum cleaners, I would rely on well-known brands and user reviews.
Thanks for this explanation of the meaning of Pa's "power" and other things you've written about.
I know very little about Pa and a quick Google search stumbled upon your site and I'm a lot smarter now.
I agree that it is best to go for well-known and trusted brands, but when funds are limited it is good to have as much information as possible. I've been looking for a cordless vacuum cleaner and now I'm better prepared to find the best one for me.
Thank you again for providing this information for all of us.
I really appreciate that.
jennine
Hello Jennine! Thank you. Glad the article brought you some clarity. LG!
Hallo,
we bought the Dyson V11 Absolute in June 2020. We always affectionately called him “Mike”, our “Mike Dyson”. We were super happy with Mike and his suction power. He extracted entire forests from the carpets. The brushes were able to rid our car of dog hair like a dog had never been around.
But then the guarantee expired in June 2022, 2 weeks later the power button broke. We have replaced this with a printed one. 2 months later the seal holder broke off while cleaning. We glued these. In January when cleaning the vacuum cleaner suddenly had misfires, I put it on the docking station and wanted to use it again later. Now it's completely dead. I took it apart and measured it. But I still have to pass this on to a friend, who can measure it better than I can.
In any case, if it is broken now, the question arises:
Buy what is equally good but not from Dyson?
(If such an expensive product just slowly scrapes off after 2 years, you want to change brands)
Any idea what's better than a Dyson these days?
Best regards
Reto
Hello Reto! I know it's annoying when something like this happens. But I haven't found a vacuum cleaner that can hold a candle to my Dyson Absolute (V8). Both in terms of suction and handling. If you want to try something cheap, you could try this one Red Key F10 look at. I'm currently testing it and it works really well. Also sucks great, but emptying a lot of dog hair is not as easy as with the Dyson.
But if you are otherwise satisfied with Dyson, I would invest the money again. I think you got a Monday device. After many years, I installed a new battery and new filters on mine and it is like new. The advantage of the Dyson is that you can still get batteries and filters years later. With the Chinese brands you often have bad luck and after a year there are no more spare parts... Oh, and that one Dyson Absolute V12 also has this exciting new roller where long hair wanders to the side and then comes off the roller there and gets sucked in. If I had to buy one right now, it would be the Dyson V12. VG, Jens
I bought the BOSCH Type BCS711PET at the best electronics store in Jakarta, Grand Indonesia Mall. Suction power is on par with Dyson but the Bosch accessory nozzles are cooler and very useful & I'm proud that they can be bent without tools.
Stupid conclusion, a vacuum cleaner with high suction power can also be equipped with a turbo brush and then a weaker vacuum cleaner with a turbo brush is always inferior
Hello Mark! Yes I agree with you. That's why I mentioned in the article that it makes little sense to just look at the suction power.
I bought the Dyson V11 when it was launched. Even after four years I still swear by him. It's probably my best purchase ever. With 3 kids, XNUMX dogs and XNUMX cats in the house I had never found a better vacuum than this one. I had to replace the motor because it was picking up moisture that I hadn't noticed. But a year and a half after the replacement, it still works just as well as it did when new.
Hello, I'm about to buy a cordless hand vacuum cleaner for cars and the measured suction power is 3,8 pa. I don't know if it's really worth it. I already had one hooked up to the car and it had really very little suction, what is that referring to? Value (3,8) From what I saw in your note above the values are around 20.000 pa
Hello Marcelo! Yes, 3,8 Pa really sounds very little. Small robot vacuums rarely go below 2000 Pa and I think that should also be the minimum you should have to vacuum a car. But 3,8 Pa can actually only be a wrong statement... I can't explain this low value any other way.